The AP reports that the Obama administration wants to buy up banks' toxic assets.
(emphasis mine) [my comment]
Administration wants to buy up banks' toxic assets
By MARTIN CRUTSINGER – 1 day ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Struggling to contain the worst financial crisis in seven decades, the Obama administration wants to buy billions of dollars of toxic assets from banks to ease borrowing for consumers and businesses.
Some industry officials familiar with the details said Saturday they expected the approach would try to remove as much as $1 trillion from banks' books. An announcement from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner could come as early as Monday.
If banks are not burdened by the soured loans, then they would be in better shape to resume more normal lending.
According to administration and industry officials, the plan would rely on the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to supplement the government's $700 billion bailout fund. The uproar over the millions of dollars in bonuses for employees at troubled insurance giant American International Group Inc. has dimmed prospects for getting more bailout money from Congress.
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the details have not been announced, said Geithner's plan will have three major parts:
_a public-private partnership to back private investors' purchases of bad assets. The $700 billion bailout fund would provide the backing. The government would match private investors dollar for dollar and share any profits equally.
_expanding a recent Fed program that provides loan for investors to buy securities backed by consumer debt. It's an effort to make it easier for people to get auto, student and credit card loans. The Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program is getting up to $100 billion from the bailout fund; that money then is being leveraged to support up to $1 trillion in Fed loans. Under Geithner's plan for the toxic assets, part of that $1 trillion would now go to support purchases of banks' troubled assets.
_using the FDIC, which guarantees bank deposits, to purchase toxic assets. Officials said the agency would create special investment partnerships and then lend them money to buy up troubled assets.
Industry officials said the administration had not disclosed to them the exact amounts of money to be devoted to the effort.
"The key is going to be if the government buys these assets quickly," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "The sooner they get these assets off banks' balance sheets, the quicker the system will find its footing and get the economy moving again." [More debt will not solve the economy’s problems]
Geithner's announcement last month of the financial rescue overhaul was widely panned by investors. The Dow Jones industrial average plunged by 380 points in large part because investors were disappointed that Geithner did not have more details.
Some analysts worry the market may once again be underwhelmed, in part because not enough resources will be devoted to the problem.
"The market is looking for a `wow' factor where they can see the administration is finally doing enough," said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at the Smith School of Business at California State University.
The administration had said in February it needed more time to work out thorny problems that former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and the Bush administration had been unable to resolve.
Geithner's new plan is meant to attack what is widely viewed as the major failure of the bailout program so far: the inability to rid banks of a mountain of soured loans and troubled mortgage-backed securities.
Some industry officials said that participation by the private sector may be harmed because potential investors will now be worried that the government will change the terms of the deal or impose new restrictions because of the current political backlash against Wall Street.
Hedge funds and other big investors are likely to be more leery of accepting the government's enticements to purchase these assets, fearing tighter government restraints in such areas as executive compensation.
The effort to deal with toxic assets is the administration's latest initiative to tackle the financial crisis.
Other programs cover mortgage foreclosures; lending to small businesses; unfreezing the markets that support credit card, student loan and auto debt; and testing of the 19 largest banks to ensure they have enough reserves to withstand an even more severe recession.
In addition to unveiling his plan for toxic assets, Geithner, who came under criticism for his handling of the AIG bonus issue, is expected to put forward next week the administration's proposals to overhaul the government's current financial regulatory structure.
The New York Times reported in Sunday editions that the regulatory proposal would include recommendations for increased oversight of executive pay at all banks, Wall Street firms and possibly other companies.
The Times quoted unnamed officials as saying the administration was still debating details of the plan including how broadly it should be applied and how far it should go beyond simple reporting requirements.
Treasury spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter would not discuss what changes to executive compensation the administration might propose. She said the whole issue was being examined in the context of an effort to keep executive bonuses from fostering excessive risk taking.
President Barack Obama said this past week that the regulatory plan would include a proposal to give the administration expanded authority to take control of major troubled institutions that are deemed too big to fail because their collapse would pose a risk to the entire financial system.
The plan is also expected to include a major change that give the Federal Reserve more powers to oversee systemic risks to the entire financial system. [More power to the institution responcible for current crisis… sigh]
The administration is working to unveil its proposed regulatory changes in advance of a meeting of the Group of 20 which Obama will attend on April 2 in London. European nations have complained that lax financial regulations in the United States set the stage for the current financial crisis.
My reaction: Last week we had the Federal Reserve’s big announcement. This week will be the treasury.
1) The Obama administration wants to buy billions of dollars of toxic assets from banks.
2) The approach would try to remove as much as $1 trillion from banks' books
3) The uproar over bonuses at AIG has dimmed prospects for getting more bailout money from Congress.
4) Geithner's plan will have three major parts:
A) A public-private partnership to back private investors' purchases of bad assets, using the $700 billion bailout fund for the backing.
B) Expanding the Fed’s The Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program and turning up to $100 billion from the bailout fund into $1 trillion in Fed loans through leverage.
C) Using the FDIC to purchase toxic assets.
5) Participation by the private sector may be harmed because potential investors will now be worried that the government will change the terms of the deal or impose new restrictions due to the current backlash against Wall Street.
6) A new regulatory plan would give the administration expanded authority to take control of major troubled institutions that are deemed too big to fail
7) It would also grant more power to the Federal Reserve.
Conclusion: This new treasury plan will expand the fed’s balance sheet by at least another trillion. This means that the US monetary base will reach 4,818 Billion in September 2009 (minus dollars held abroad). This will give us a 19-fold increase in the money supply.

Dear Eric;
Great work as always, but please if your there “online”, can you give us a time frame forecast for such downfalls, cause I noticed that you have been mentioning September 2009 as the turning point, and honestly most of us “I guess” are mid to upper mid class income based people, where our savings are not that huge, and at the same time due to the current global economical situations, we are getting short on our monthly incomes that is shifting us towards our savings, where most of us “ I guess again” have put them in Gold… its becoming like the ECG heart graph a bit for me the least.
Many thanks again for your wonderful so human work Eric
Mudar
Hi Eric,
I still have some doubts about hiperinflation. Please have a look at this report and let me know why US situation is so differrnt from Japan and In case of differences (reserve currency et cet) why these differneces should start all at once.
http://www.csis.org/media/csis/events/081029_japan_koo.pdf
Best regards,
Jarek
What I don't understand about this whole plan is why any private entity would want to participate? Not only would they run the risk of the government capping bonuses or altering contracts, I honestly don't see what the private entities would be getting? A bunch of debt? What else? To what advantage would it be for them to partner up with the government?
The gov may be incompetent and just blowing the taxpayer's money away buy buying debt and bad assets off the banks, but any successful company would most likely have competant management / leadership, with their own private money invested in their organization, so once again why would they want to do this? Could someone please explain this to me? Or is this just more wishful thinking on the part of the government?
Timeframe's are impossible. Even Mises could not forecast the inflations. Rockwell even acknowledges that none of these great minds expected the fiat system to last this long.
Eric, please take a look at this
http://tinyurl.com/cjzsaf
It is an article from stockhouse and on cnbc. I'd like to see you comment on it.
This is nothing but a GIANT scam on "We The People" to crash our economy and move into a One World Government.
Eric: I have only recently discovered you...and am happy I have.
Do you have any additional thoughts on how this latest plan debacle will serve the interests of countries and the UN who wish to drop the dollar as the reserve currency?
I have noted your site with a link for the members of PumaPac
www.pumapac.org
I am glad you are here.
Post a Comment