Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Backwardation In Soybean And Sugar Confirms Imminent Food Crisis

by Eric deCarbonnel

Bloomberg reports that China Shouldn't Get Fooled by Soybean Futures from April 2008. Everything it says about backwardation in Chinese futures markets now applies to US soybean, sugar, and copper futures.

(emphasis mine) [my comment]

China Shouldn't Get Fooled by Soybean Futures: Andy Mukherjee
Commentary by Andy Mukherjee


[Although this article is from 2008, US soybean and sugar futures are today in backwardation, just as described below.]

Futures contracts on both soybean and soy meal are in ``backwardation'' on China's Dalian Commodity Exchange [and now here in the US too], meaning that longer-dated futures are progressively cheaper than nearer- term contracts.

Backwardated Contracts

Soybean futures for delivery in January 2009 are 21 percent cheaper than those that mature next month; for soy meal, the difference is about 14 percent.

China is the world's biggest buyer of soybeans, which are crushed to make cooking oil and the protein-rich soybean meal. The latter is mostly fed to hogs, poultry and cattle.

A steeply backwardated market typically suggests that soybeans are in extremely short supply. As stocks get replenished by new harvests, the deficit will ease.

Such a view may not always be correct.


One can't rely on the futures contract for a pure estimate of the expected spot price tomorrow.

The futures price subtracts, from today's expectation of tomorrow's price, a risk premium that hedgers have to pay to speculators to buy insurance.

When inventories are too low to absorb shocks to the demand- supply equilibrium, spot prices rise more than futures (because tomorrow's stocks can't be consumed today) and cause backwardation.

Risk Premium

In such instances,
the risk premium also often tends to rise and makes the futures contract cheaper -- in relation to today's price -- even when there's no drop in the expected spot rate for tomorrow.



The downward-sloping shape of the futures curves in soybeans -- or copper, for that matter [or sugar] -- suggests supplies are now tight; yet they don't confirm that shortages are expected to ease.

The Chinese authorities shouldn't allow themselves to become complacent.

Backwardation in US Sugar futures

Sugar

(Aug 25,2009)

Month

Sett

OpInt

9-Oct

21.92

292820

10-Jan

22.79

180

10-Mar

23.29

236134

10-May

22.06

49293

10-Jul

20.71

107088

10-Oct

20.22

74860

11-Jan

19.91

2

11-Mar

19.48

41027

11-May

18.35

11267

11-Jul

17.33

12965

11-Oct

17.01

13539

12-Mar

16.63

8398

12-May

15.81

2445

12-Jul

15.29

2832




Backwardation in US Soybean futures

CBOT Soybeans

(Aug 25,2009)

Month

Sett

OpInt

9-Sep

1091

14717

9-Nov

999

243594

10-Jan

1001 1/4

55564

10-Mar

997 1/4

24492

10-May

988 3/4

18061

10-Jul

991

19828

10-Aug

983

143

10-Sep

958

52

10-Nov

939

22070

11-Jan

944

52

11-Mar

948

37

11-May

948

2

11-Jul

951

11

11-Aug

949

0

11-Sep

948

0

11-Nov

945

443

12-Jul

951

6

12-Nov

952

244





My reaction: Backwardation in soybean and sugar is proof that both commodities are in extremely short supply.

1) A steeply backwardated market typically suggests that soybeans are in extremely short supply.

2) One can't rely on the futures contract for a pure estimate of the expected spot price tomorrow.

3) The futures price subtracts, from today's expectation of tomorrow's price, a risk premium that hedgers have to pay to speculators to buy insurance.

4) When inventories are too low to absorb shocks to the demand- supply equilibrium, spot prices rise more than futures (because tomorrow's stocks can't be consumed today) and cause backwardation.

5) The risk premium also often tends to rise and makes the futures contract cheaper -- in relation to today's price -- even when there's no drop in the expected spot rate for tomorrow.
The downward-sloping shape of the futures curves in soybeans, copper, or sugar suggests supplies are now tight; yet they don't confirm that shortages are expected to ease.

Conclusion: Watch soybean’s September contract and sugar’s October contract. These are the two which are most likely to default.

What a default would look like in soybean and sugar futures

LME reports about 2006 Backwardation Limit for Nickel.

16/08/2006
LME Imposes Backwardation Limit for Nickel

At 1700 hours today, The London Metal Exchange (LME) announced that the Special Committee has imposed a backwardation limit of $300.00 per tonne per day in the nickel market and that there will be a suspension of the Lending Guidance in respect of those with nickel positions.

After taking account of all the relevant factors, and following consultation with LCH.Clearnet, the Special Committee has resolved that:

1. Backwardation limit

Those with short positions in nickel falling prompt on Friday 18 August 2006, and on subsequent prompt dates until further notice, who are unable to effect physical delivery and/or unable to borrow metal at a backwardation of no more than $300.00 per tonne per day, shall be able to defer delivery for a day at a penalty of $300.00 per tonne.
Those with long positions for prompt on those days who are subject to deferred delivery shall be entitled to compensation of $300.00 per tonne per day

2. Lending Guidance

The Lending Guidance in respect of nickel shall be suspended with immediate effect such that those with dominant long positions in nickel shall not be obliged to lend in accordance with the Lending Guidance until further notice.

Commenting on the announcement, Simon Heale, LME Chief Executive said:

“Nickel stocks are at historically low levels and we now have a genuine material shortage. Our first priority is to ensure that trading remains orderly and to prevent the risk of settlement defaults. [LME prevented defaults on Nickel contracts by saying shorts didn’t have to deliver. What do you think the reaction would be if they try to do this in soybean and sugar? It should be interesting.]

“The Special Committee has been constantly monitoring nickel stocks, the effect of those trading for the nearby prompt dates and conditions in the nickel market. The Committee will keep this under constant review and will remove the backwardation limit and reintroduce Lending Guidance as soon as it considers it prudent to do so.”

pencil icon, that\
8 Comments:
Daniel said...

Hi Eric, default on nickel didn't collapse LME or Nymex, and didn't collapse USD or Pounds few years ago.

So why would default on sugar and soybean collapsing Comex or USD this time?

On what basis you can be so sure that default on sugar or soybean can ignite many more default on other commodities this time?

Anonymous said...

One thing might be that people don't eat nickel; and governments don't react in panic with further hoarding and price controls when nickel defaults.

Robert said...

Frankly these last two articles are a bit terrifying.

It seems likely that a whole bunch of really bad stuff is about to come crashing down on us.

Food running out.. renewed economic crisis. Energy crisis. Swine/Bird flu/pandemic diseases.

Time to start hoarding?

Anonymous said...

THE SKY IS FALLING!11! BUY GOLD, SILVER, and RUSSIAN LAND! THE SKY IS FALLING!!1!
AND IT WONT MATTER THAT THAT SHIT WONT BE OF VALUE WHEN THE SKY FALLS!!!!11~!

You doomsters never fail to show how crazy and inept you are. This post is using old articles to prove a point, last time i looked it wasn't 2007.

BlasterMillennia said...

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=41451932&postcount=1450

James said...

I understand that some food might be short on supply like sugar or soybeans, but what makes you think that there will be an overall food shortage? I don't comprehend the connection there...

Matthew said...

Hey Eric,

I sincerely appreciate the quality of your articles on this site. I have been following your articles for a few months, and I really enjoy reading them.

This article confuses me though. My thought is that backwardation in the prices of these commodities indicates that supply is CURRENTLY tight but is going to get looser.

In the long term supply can generally be expanded to meet demand, but in the short term there can be differences. This looks like an instance where there is a short term supply/demand imbalance (i.e., too little supply compared to demand). The backwardation of the futures market makes it look like investors are expecting this imbalance to be resolved with cheaper prices in the future.

If instead the futures market for these commodities were in contango (i.e., futures prices higher than spot), then I would believe that supply would get even tighter in the future.

What are your thoughs?

Thanks,
Matt

Johnny Dangereaux said...

Hello Eric,
I found you a few weeks ago. i like your writing. As a matter of fact I am a broker in the soybean crush in the CBOT Grain room.

I said Friday to buy sep nov....and WTF what a rally! The sep meal rallied all last week and the sep beans didn't move, relatively. Then AFTER Friday's option exp. Kaboom... 1st Sep crush went from 75 to 115 in a week on the meal rally and then to 95 on the bean catch-up in a day!....keep up the good work...if you day-trade this stuff let me know I might be able to get you some insights from the floor during the day.
And commenter Matt, you are partially correct. This situation sets up for a possible butterfly spread. It's a little late but one could have bought Sep09 and July10 and sold 2 Nov09's....Nov will be the weak leg due to harvest pressure...and July will go up because we'll be short on beans again next summer, if history is any guide!

The Chinese are hungry, that's for sure...and after reading about the N China Plain drought I put out a bullish soybean bias last Tuesday!

If this cool/wet in the midwest persists you will get 2 things....a late harvest and immature corn...both bullish

Key Entries

Subscribe feeds rss Recent Entries

Category Cloud

News Developments

Interesting Background Information

Blogroll

Links

Recent Comments

Subscribe feeds via e-mail
Subscribe in your preferred RSS reader