<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post4556293503956221045..comments</id><updated>2009-07-09T18:01:12.844-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Market Skeptics: *****Understanding The US Treasury Market*****</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/feeds/4556293503956221045/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html'/><author><name>Eric deCarbonnel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023745289801416061</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>6</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-6795091132095899096</id><published>2009-07-09T09:18:03.954-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-09T09:18:03.954-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mr. deCarbonell

Thank you for the math examples c...</title><content type='html'>Mr. deCarbonell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for the math examples clarifying your earlier point. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based upon your examples, you seem to believe that an extreme devaluation is possible. I agree that this is possible though I am uncertain as to how probable it is. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In any case, suppose your extreme example were to occur, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;531,019 / .0.001 = 531,019,000 (98.9%)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You have stated that the U.S. could not print its way out of such a situation. I tend to agree. However, what is the alternative?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you believe that the U.S would default on its obligations, or in other words, declare insolvency?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/6795091132095899096'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/6795091132095899096'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html?showComment=1247156283954#c6795091132095899096' title=''/><author><name>Patagonian Plato</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03505234376872881268</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-4556293503956221045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/posts/default/4556293503956221045' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-6357404842168735907</id><published>2009-07-08T20:01:58.884-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-08T20:01:58.884-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Jane said... 
Suppose you are right, TIPS is only ...</title><content type='html'>Jane said... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Suppose you are right, TIPS is only 8% from total treasury.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lets say USD drop 20%, 8% x 1.2 = 9.6% only.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This only add up 1.6% of debt burden. Isn&amp;#39;t it? How bad is this??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;Sorry, the way you are calculating it is a little wrong.  See examples below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1)  Lets say USD drop 20%.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;531,019 / .8 = 663,774 (10.1%)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2)  Lets say USD drop 93.3%. (See &lt;a href="http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/03/fed-is-planning-15-fold-increase-in-us.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;the Fed is planning 15-Fold increase in US monetary base&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;531,019 / .0.0667 = 7,965,285 (57.4%)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3)  Lets say USD drop 99.9%. (See &lt;a href="http://www.marketskeptics.com/2008/12/nightmare-german-inflation.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Nightmare German Inflation&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;531,019 / .0.001 = 531,019,000 (98.9%)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/6357404842168735907'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/6357404842168735907'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html?showComment=1247108518884#c6357404842168735907' title=''/><author><name>Eric deCarbonnel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023745289801416061</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='16647247438234894981'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-4556293503956221045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/posts/default/4556293503956221045' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-2043108912559200908</id><published>2009-07-07T17:37:40.469-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T17:37:40.469-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Jane

The same exact question came to my mind as I...</title><content type='html'>Jane&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same exact question came to my mind as I read the paragraph dismissing those who state that the U.S. will print its way through this problem. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition, even though TIPS will raise U.S. obligations when inflation eventually hits, and I agree with Mr. deCarbonnel that it eventually will, this only means a bit more printing to cover the increased obligation. Granted, this may in and of itself further drive up inflation and devalue the dollar, but the extra - inflation increase/dollar devaluation - will be slight due to the small amount of TIPS on the market.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My question is not meant to minimize the severity of the ongoing situation. It is only to agree that there appears to be a flaw pertaining to this particular statement. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fed seems to think it has an almost limitless ability to increase the money supply. I will never again under-estimate them on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This caveat aside, good piece.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look forward to Mr. deCarbonnel’s reply.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/2043108912559200908'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/2043108912559200908'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html?showComment=1247013460469#c2043108912559200908' title=''/><author><name>Patagonian Plato</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03505234376872881268</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-4556293503956221045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/posts/default/4556293503956221045' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-7268845265490639205</id><published>2009-07-07T06:59:02.063-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T06:59:02.063-07:00</updated><title type='text'>20% is not exactly a currency collapse. I'd expect...</title><content type='html'>20% is not exactly a currency collapse. I&amp;#39;d expect more along the lines of a minimum loss of 50% in a few months in Eric&amp;#39;s scenario, and far more over time. Re: Ben Franklin&amp;#39;s will be cheaper than charmin&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;brazilian rainforest toilet paper&amp;#39; americans use right now.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/7268845265490639205'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/7268845265490639205'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html?showComment=1246975142063#c7268845265490639205' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-4556293503956221045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/posts/default/4556293503956221045' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-3112295780736974326</id><published>2009-07-06T20:28:13.270-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-06T20:28:13.270-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Suppose you are right, TIPS is only 8% from total ...</title><content type='html'>Suppose you are right, TIPS is only 8% from total treasury.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lets say USD drop 20%, 8% x 1.2 = 9.6% only.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This only add up 1.6% of debt burden. Isn&amp;#39;t it? How bad is this??</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/3112295780736974326'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/3112295780736974326'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html?showComment=1246937293270#c3112295780736974326' title=''/><author><name>Jane</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-4556293503956221045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/posts/default/4556293503956221045' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-5424492577167483418</id><published>2009-07-06T19:56:03.714-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-06T19:56:03.714-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for your great work.  I am of the opinion t...</title><content type='html'>Thanks for your great work.  I am of the opinion that TIPS will be defaulted first in a currency devaluation situation.&lt;br /&gt;I ahve been reading for about 1 month, love the content.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/5424492577167483418'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/4556293503956221045/comments/default/5424492577167483418'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html?showComment=1246935363714#c5424492577167483418' title=''/><author><name>getyourselfconnected</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02802078645713106743</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/understanding-us-treasury-market.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-502356674750161309.post-4556293503956221045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/502356674750161309/posts/default/4556293503956221045' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>